4.6 Article

Prostate cancer cell growth is modulated by adipocyte-cancer cell interaction

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages 716-720

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04218.x

Keywords

prostate; cancer; adipocytes; cytokines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE To assess whether adipocytes (mesenchymal stromal cells thought to affect the proliferation and differentiation of epithelial cells) affect the behaviour of prostate cancer cells in vitro , as prostate cancer metastasizes to the bone, which is an adipocyte-rich environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS The human bone-metastatic prostate carcinoma cell line PC3 was cultured with or without adipocytes in a three-dimensional collagen gel matrix. Histological and immunohistochemical assays were used to evaluate the proliferation and differentiation of PC3 cells. The cytokine expression of this culture assembly was also examined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS The proliferation and differentiation of cancer cells were clearly changed on co-culture with adipocytes compared with the control cultures. The mean (range) bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) indices estimated (according to uptake) to evaluate the growth of the cultured cells were 36.3 (8.55)% in the co-culture and 26.95 (10.50) in the control (P < 0.02). PC3 cells in co-culture formed larger clusters than in the control, at 16.0 (11.0) vs 14.0 (10.0), respectively (P < 0.01). Cancer cells also showed pleomorphism, varying from cuboidal to spindle-shaped. The expressions of vascular endothelial and platelet-derived growth factor were greater in co-culture than in the control. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that adipocytes modulate the growth, morphology and cytokine expression of prostate cancer cells. This specific mesenchymal stromal cell type is important in the biological behaviour of prostate cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available