4.5 Review

Fruit, vegetables, and the prevention of cancer: Research challenges

Journal

NUTRITION
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 467-470

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-9007(02)01037-7

Keywords

anticarcinogenic agents; case; case-control studies; cohort; cohort studies; epidemiology; confounding factors; fruits; vegetables

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: A great deal of epidemiologic evidence has indicated that fruits and vegetables are protective against numerous forms of cancer. However, there are many gaps in our knowledge METHODS: In this pilot-study we reviewed more than 200 cohort and case-control studies to determine the shape of the dose-response relationship (i.e ,how the risk reduction per extra serving,of fruits' and vegetables changes With the actual intake of these foods). We found major barriers to investigating this. As part of this pilot study we also investigated whether specific fruits and vegetables are responsible for the anticancer action of these foods of whether. a wide variety is required for optimal protection. If the former is correct, then fruits and vegetables may,contain one or a small number of magic bullets; if the latter is correct, then a teamwork concept may be valid. RESULTS: Different findings suggested that the teamwork concept is much more likely. Many studies, especially older ones, have ignored potential confounding variables such. as energy intake, alcohol consumption, physical activity, body mass index, smoking, and. socioeconomic status (although many recent studies have adjusted for education). Other potential-confounders that have-generally been ignored are consumption of whole grain cereals and the use of vitamin and mineral supplements. CONCLUSIONS. The inverse,association between intake of fruits and vegetable and the risk of cancer of the colon, breast, and stomach has generally been nine stronger in case-control than in cohort studies. We have no clear explanation for this. (C) Elsevier Inc. 2003.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available