4.4 Article

Oral L-arginine improves endothelial function in healthy individuals older than 70 years

Journal

VASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 77-81

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1191/1358863x03vm474oa

Keywords

ageing; asymmetric dimethylarginine; flow-mediated vasodilation; oral L-arginine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ageing is associated with progressive endothelial dysfunction in normal humans. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery is impaired in elderly individuals with cardiovascular disease and vascular nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability is reduced. We investigated whether oral L-arginine, the substrate for NO synthesis, can improve impaired FMD in healthy very old people. In a prospective, double-blind, randomized crossover trial, 12 healthy old subjects (age 73.8+/-2.7 years) took L-arginine (8 g p.o. two times daily) or placebo for 14 days each, separated by a wash-out period of 14 days. FMD was determined by high-resolution ultrasound in the brachial artery during reactive hyperaemia. Baseline artery diameter was 3.88+/-0.18 mm. L-Arginine significantly improved FMD (to 5.7+/-1.2%, p<0.0001), whereas placebo had no effect (-0.25+/-0.7%; n.s.). After L-arginine, plasma levels of L-arginine increased significantly (114.9+/-11.6 versus 57.4+/-5.0 mumol/l), but placebo had no effect. As NO synthesis can be antagonized by its endogenous inhibitor asymmetric dimethyl L-arginine (ADMA), we determined ADMA plasma concentrations, which were elevated at baseline in comparison to healthy middle-aged individuals (3.9+/-0.2 versus 1.0+/-0.1 mumol/l; p<0.0001). ADMA remained unchanged during treatment, but L-arginine supplementation normalized the L-arginine/ADMA ratio (p<0.05). We conclude that in healthy very old age endothelial function is impaired and may be improved by oral L-arginine supplementation, probably due to normalization of the L-arginine/ADMA ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available