4.6 Article

Single-beat estimation of right ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationship

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01023.2002

Keywords

contractility; preload; afterload; pulmonary hypertension; hypoxia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Assessment of right ventricular ( RV) contractility from end-systolic pressure-volume relationships (ESPVR) is difficult due to problems in measuring RV instantaneous volume and to effects of changes in RV preload or afterload. We therefore investigated in anesthetized dogs whether RV ESPVR and contractility can be determined without measuring RV volume and without changing RV preload or afterload. The maximal RV pressure of isovolumic beats (P-max) was predicted from isovolumic portions of RV pressure during ejecting beats and compared with P-max measured during the first beat after pulmonary artery clamping. In RV pressure-volume loops obtained from RV pressure and integrated pulmonary arterial flow, end-systolic elastance (E-es) was assessed as the slope of P-max-derived ESPVR, pulmonary artery effective elastance (E-a) as the slope of end-diastolic to end-systolic relation, and coupling efficiency as the E-es-to-E-a ratio (E-es/E-a). Predicted P-max correlated with observed P-max (r = 0.98 +/- 0.02). Dobutamine increased E-es from 1.07 to 2.00 mmHg/ml and E-es/E-a from 1.64 to 2.49, and propranolol decreased E-es/E-a from 1.64 to 0.91 (all P < 0.05). After adrenergic blockade, preload reduction did not affect E-es, whereas hypoxia and arterial constriction markedly increased E-a and somewhat increased E-es due to the Anrep effect. Low preload did not affect E-es/E-a and high afterload decreased E-es/E-a. In conclusion, in the right ventricle 1) P-max can be calculated from normal beats, 2) P-max can be used to determine ESPVR without change in load, and 3) P-max-derived ESPVR can be used to assess ventricular contractility and ventricular-arterial coupling efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available