4.0 Article

Activated memory B cell subsets correlate with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus -: Delineation by expression of CD27, IgD, and CD95

Journal

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 1762-1773

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.23498

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Analysis of peripheral B cell subsets in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has provided evidence of specific alterations, such as an expansion of CD27++ plasma cells/blasts and transitional B cells. However, memory B cells in lupus have not been thoroughly investigated, and only recently a CD27- memory B cell subset was identified in the peripheral blood of lupus patients. Focusing on CD27-B cells, this study aimed to identify abnormalities in peripheral B cell subsets in patients with SLE., Methods. Three independent cohorts of lupus patients were used to characterize CD27- memory B cells, using multiparameter flow cytometry and single-cell reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of heavy-chain transcripts. Results. We identified a homogeneous subset of CD27-,IgD-,CD95+ memory B cells with an activated phenotype that was increased in patients with disease flares and that correlated with disease activity and serologic abnormalities. In contrast, the entire subset of CD27--,IgD- B cells was found to be heterogeneous, did not correlate significantly with lupus activity, and was also increased in patients with bacterial infections. Conclusion. We conclude that CD95 is a useful marker to identify CD27- memory B cells with an activated phenotype, which might serve as a biomarker for lupus activity and as a target of further investigations aiming to elucidate the pathogenic potential of these cells and the mechanisms involved in the generation as well as regulation of this CD27-,IgD-,CD95+ memory B cell subset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available