4.4 Article

Physiological energetics of the green abalone, Haliotis fulgens, fed on a balanced diet

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY
Volume 289, Issue 2, Pages 263-276

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0981(03)00049-2

Keywords

balanced diet; energetics; Haliotis fulgens; nutrition; physiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A regression of different physiological responses against body size enables populations or stock cultures of various size ranges to be compared. Thus, the aim of the present work was to evaluate the physiological responses from juvenile green abalone (Haliotis fulgens), grouped according to size, in a standard controlled culture condition within their optimal range to create the balanced growth equation within an allometric relation, providing a basic framework for physiological research into H. fulgens. Feed intake, absorption efficiency, respiration and excretion were measured as functions of dry tissue weight (DTW) in juvenile abalone acclimated on a balanced diet. The daily feed intake (1) was related to body mass by the relationship I (mg day(-1)) = 24.25W(0.59). Absorption efficiency averaged 87% and was independent of body size. The equation relating daily respiration rate (R) to body mass was R (ml O-2 day(-1))= 12.013W(0.704), including night correction. The rate of ammonia excretion (0 was related to dry tissue weight by the equation U (mumol N-NH4 day(-1)) = 43.57W(0.85). The energetic value of food was 18.8 J mg(-1). The low feeding activity (< 1% of abalone live weight per day) was compensated for by a relatively high absorption efficiency and a depression of 23% in the metabolic rate during diurnal activity. Gross and net growth efficiencies were constant throughout the size range, with average values of 36.4% and 41.5%, respectively. Values of the ON ratio, with an average of 31.5, showed a higher use of proteins from the diet as an energy source for the size range studied. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available