4.6 Article

A new epitope-based HLA-DPB matching approach for cadaver kidney retransplants

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 75, Issue 9, Pages 1527-1532

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000061759.57702.8A

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Several years ago a significant impact of matching for HLA-DPB1 alleles on the survival of cadaver kidney retransplants was shown. Here we report the results of a new approach, based on matching for HLA-DPB1 epitopes. Methods. The analysis is based on 1,478 patients who received a cadaver kidney retransplant between 1988 and 1998. DNA methodology (polymerase chain reaction, sequence-specific oligonucleotides) was used to perform HLA-DPB1 typing. Epitope matching was facilitated with the aid of sequence databases and computer calculations. Results. Matching for the HLA-DP epitopes A, B, E, and F, corresponding to the homonymous hypervariable regions of the second exon of the DPB1 gene, seems to have a greater influence on graft survival than matching for the epitopes C and D. Within a group of 529 retransplants with exactly one allelic HLA-DPBI mismatch, a significantly better graft outcome was observed when less than two epitope mismatches were found, compared with the group with more than three epitope mismatches (at 2 years: 77.8% vs. 65.8%, P=0.0112). Importantly, patients with two DPB1 allele mismatches who had less than or equal to two epitope mismatches exhibited a significantly better graft outcome than recipients who had one HLA-DPB1 allelic mismatch but more than three epitope mismatches (at 2 years: 77.1% vs. 65.8%, P=0.0488). Conclusions. The findings indicate that the impact of HLA-DPB1 matching on the outcome of kidney retransplants is a result of the predominant immunogenicity of certain epitopes of the HLA-DP molecule. Matching for immunogenic HLA-DPB1 epitopes seems to be functionally more relevant than classical matching at the allelic level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available