4.7 Article

Clinical significance of secreted protein acidic and rich in cystein in esophageal carcinoma and its relation to carcinoma progression

Journal

CANCER
Volume 97, Issue 10, Pages 2412-2419

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11368

Keywords

secreted protein acidic and rich in cystein; matrix metalloproteinase-2; esophageal carcinoma; lymph node metastasis; prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cystein (SPARC) is a small extramatrix-associated protein. Its production increases during angiogenesis and enhances matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) expression. The goal of this study was to show the clinical relevance of SPARC and its relation to MMP-2 expression in esophageal carcinoma patients. METHODS. The authors investigated SPARC mRNA expression in 48 tissue samples of esophageal tumors characterized by MMP-2 mRNA expression in a Northern blot analysis. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry were also performed in esophageal carcinoma tissue samples. RESULTS. All 48 tissue specimens had high expression of SPARC mRNA. Quantitative evaluation showed that high SPARC mRNA was associated significantly with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.05) and poorer prognosis (P = 0.025). Expression of SPARC mRNA was associated significantly with MMP-2 mRNA expression (R = 0.65; P < 0.01). Both SPARC and MMP-2 were immunolocalized intensely in carcinoma and stromal cells, whereas normal esophageal mucosa and submucosa did not express SPARC. The 35-kilodalton cleaved SPARC was detected in esophageal carcinoma tissue specimens by Western blot analysis and it was associated with MMP-2 mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS. in terms of clinical significance, SPARC accumulation may reflect a functional correlation with MMP-2 and the associated expression could play a key role in the progression of esophageal carcinoma. (C) 2003 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available