4.7 Article

On the accuracy limits of orbital expansion methods:: Explicit effects of k-functions on atomic and molecular energies

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 118, Issue 19, Pages 8594-8610

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1566744

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For selected first- and second-row atoms, correlation-optimized Gaussian k functions have been determined and used in the construction of septuple-zeta basis sets for the correlation-consistent cc-pVXZ and aug-cc-pVXZ series. Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) and second-order Moller-Plesset (MP2) total and pair energies were computed for H, N, O, F, S, H-2, N-2, HF, H2O, and (H2O)(2) to demonstrate the consistency of the new septuple-zeta basis sets as extensions of the established (aug)-cc-pVXZ series. The pV7Z and aug-pV7Z sets were then employed in numerous extrapolation schemes on the test species to probe the accuracy limits of the conventional MP2 method vis-a-vis explicitly correlated (MP2-R12/A) benchmarks. For (singlet, triplet) pairs, (X+1/2)(-n) functional forms with n=(3, 5) proved best for extrapolations. The (mean abs. relative error, std. dev.) among the 73 singlet pair energies in the dataset is (1.96%, 0.54%) and (1.72%, 0.51%) for explicit computations with the pV7Z and aug-pV7Z basis sets, respectively, but only (0.07%, 0.09%) after two-point, 6Z/7Z extrapolations with the (X+1/2)(-3) form. The effects of k functions on molecular relative energies were examined by application of the septuple-zeta basis sets to the barrier to linearity and the dimerization energy of water. In the former case, an inherent uncertainty in basis set extrapolations persists which is comparable in size to the error (approximate to20 cm(-1)) in explicit aug-pV7Z computations, revealing fundamental limits of orbital expansion methods in the domain of subchemical accuracy (0.1 kcal mol(-1)). (C) 2003 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available