4.6 Article

Signal recognition particle binds to ribosome-bound signal sequences with fluorescence-detected subnanomolar affinity that does not diminish as the nascent chain lengthens

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 278, Issue 20, Pages 18628-18637

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M300173200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL38779] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM08523, GM 26494] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The binding of signal recognition particle (SRP) to ribosome-bound signal sequences has been characterized directly and quantitatively using fluorescence spectroscopy. A fluorescent probe was incorporated co-translationally into the signal sequence of a ribosome.nascent chain complex (RNC), and upon titration with SRP, a large and saturable increase in fluorescence intensity was observed. Spectral analyses of SRP and RNC association as a function of concentration allowed us to measure, at equilibrium, K-d values of 0.05-0.38 nM for SRP.RNC complexes with different signal sequences. Competitive binding experiments with nonfluorescent RNC species revealed that the nascent chain probe did not alter SRP affinity and that SRP has significant affinity for both nontranslating ribosomes (K-d = 71 nM) and RNCs that lack an exposed signal sequence (K-d = 8 nM). SRP can therefore distinguish between translating and nontranslating ribosomes. The very high signal sequence-dependent SRP.RNC affinity did not decrease as the nascent chain lengthened. Thus, the inhibition of SRP-dependent targeting of RNCs to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane observed with long nascent chains does not result from reduced SRP binding to the signal sequence, as widely thought, but rather from a subsequent step, presumably nascent chain interference of SRP.RNC association with the SRP receptor and/or translocon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available