4.7 Article

Use of X-ray tomography to study the porosity and morphology of granules

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue 1, Pages 57-63

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/S0032-5910(03)00043-3

Keywords

X-ray tomography; imaging; granules; internal microstructure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

X-ray computed tomography (XRCT) is a technique that uses X-ray images to reconstruct the internal microstructure of objects. Known as a CAT scan in medicine, it has found wide application for whole-body and partial-body imaging of hard tissues (e.g., bone). A modem tabletop XRCT system with a resolution of about 4 mum was used to characterize some pharmaceutical granules. Total porosity, pore size distribution, and geometric structure of pores in granules produced using different conditions and materials were studied. The results were compared to data obtained from mercury porosimetty. It was found that while XRCT is less precise in the determination of total porosity in comparison to mercury porosimetry, it provides detailed morphological information such as pore shape, spatial distribution, and connectivity. The method is nondestructive and accurate down to the resolution of the instrument. Tomographic images show that the pore network of individual granules comprises relatively large cavities connected by narrow pore necks. The major structural difference between granules produced at different conditions of compaction and shear is a reduction in the pore neck diameter; the cavity size is relatively insensitive to these conditions. Comparison of pore size distributions determined from tomographic images and mercury porosimetry indicates that mercury intrusion measures the pore neck size distribution, while tomography measures the true size distribution of pores ca. 4 mum or larger (the instrument resolution). (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available