4.5 Article

Sardinian alcohol-preferring and non-preferring rats show different reactivity to aversive stimuli and a similar response to a natural reward

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 973, Issue 2, Pages 275-284

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02533-2

Keywords

dopamine; elevated plus maze; escape test; microdialysis; palatable food; unavoidable stress

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) and non-preferring (sNP) rats were studied to ascertain whether some behavioral and/or neurochemical traits, beyond ethanol preference, differentiated the two lines. Spontaneous reactivity of Wistar, sP and sNP rats to aversive or pleasurable stimuli was examined in an avoidance test, an elevated plus maze test, and in response to palatable food presentation. As the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic system plays a relevant role in the response to rewarding or aversive stimuli, extraneuronal dopamine levels and cocaine-induced dopamine accumulation in the nucleus accumbens shell (NAcS) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) were studied by microdialysis in the three groups of rats. Moreover, rats were exposed to repeated unavoidable stress and their avoidance response and NAcS dopamine output were determined. Finally, the capacity of sP, sNP, and Wistar rats to learn a palatable food-sustained appetitive behavior was studied. The present study shows that, beyond ethanol preference, there are several behavioral and neurochemical distinctions between sP and sNP rats. The sP rats displayed an increased level of anxiety-like behavior and sNP rats showed a reduced avoidance of noxious stimuli, compared to Wistar rats. Moreover, in the NAcS and PFC, extraneuronal dopamine levels were higher in sP rats and lower in sNP rats compared to Wistar rats; cocaine-induced dopamine accumulation in the NAcS was higher in sP rats than in sNP and Wistar rats. However, sP and sNP rats showed a similar behavioral and neurochemical response to chronic unavoidable stress. Interestingly, they also showed similar behavioral and neurochemical responses to a natural rewarding stimulus and a similar ability to learn an appetitive behavior. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available