4.5 Article

Nodal marginal zone lymphoma:: A heterogeneous tumor -: A comprehensive analysis of a series of 27 cases

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 762-771

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200306000-00006

Keywords

nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma; somatic mutations; IgV(H) genes; immunohistochemistry; apoptosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have reviewed the clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypical, and molecular features of a series of 27 cases of nodal marginal zone lymphoma with the aim of defining this entity more precisely. The series was characterized by a relatively favorable clinical course, with a low clinical stage at diagnosis (59% patients with clinical stage I-II) and a 5-year overall survival probability of 79%. However, the disease persisted in a relatively large fraction of the patients, thus yielding a 5-year failure-free survival probability of 22%. Molecular and immunohistochemical analyses of the series revealed heterogeneity in the frequency of IgV(H), somatic mutation and in the expression of IgD, CD43, MUM1, and CD38. Apart from the absence of nuclear Bc110, no clear distinction could be made from the expression profiling of other B-cell lymphomas claimed to be derived from marginal zone B cells. Additionally, the immunophenotype of the tumoral cells in all cases but one differed from that described in monocytoid B cells. It was characterized by a Bcl2-, p21+, cyclin E+ profile. The analysis of apoptosis-regulator proteins disclosed abnormalities in the expression of survivin and active caspase 3, which could partially explain the abnormal regulation of apoptosis observed in these tumors. Molecular and immunohistochemical data obtained in this study strongly imply that there is significant heterogeneity among the cases included in the category termed nodal marginal zone lymphoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available