4.7 Article

Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins as Novel Targets in Inflammatory Processes

Journal

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 2240-U229

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.234294

Keywords

Endothelium; Pharmacology; NF-kappaB; inflammation; inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), such as X-linked or cellular IAP 1/2 (XIAP, cIAP1/2), are important regulators of apoptosis. IAP antagonists are currently under clinical investigation as anticancer agents. Interestingly, IAPs participate in the inflammation-associated TNF receptor signaling complex and regulate NF kappa B signaling. This raises the question about the role of IAPs in inflammation. Here, we investigated the anti-inflammatory potential of IAP inhibitors and the role of IAPs in inflammatory processes of endothelial cells. Methods and Results-In mice, the small molecule IAP antagonist A-4.10099.1 (ABT) suppressed antigen-induced arthritis, leukocyte infiltration in concanavalin A-evoked liver injury, and leukocyte transmigration in the TNF alpha-activated cremaster muscle. In vitro, we observed an attenuation of leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction by downregulation of the intercellular adhesion molecule-1. ABT did not impair NF kappa B signaling but decreased the TNF alpha-induced activation of the TGF-beta-activated kinase 1, p38, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase. These effects are based on the proteasomal degradation of cIAP1/2 accompanied by an altered ratio of the levels of membrane-localized TNF receptor-associated factors 2 and 5. Conclusion-Our results reveal IAP antagonism as a profound anti-inflammatory principle in vivo and highlight IAPs as important regulators of inflammatory processes in endothelial cells. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:2240-2250.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available