4.6 Article

Mott-Schottky analysis of nanoporous semiconductor electrodes in dielectric state deposited on SnO2(F) conducting substrates

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 150, Issue 6, Pages E293-E298

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1.1568741

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper analyzes the dark capacitance of nanostructured electrodes in the dielectric state, with particular emphasis on TiO2 electrodes deposited over a transparent conducting substrate of SnO2(F). It is shown that at those potentials where the TiO2 nanostructure is in the dielectric state, the capacitance is controlled by the contact SnO2(F)/(electrolyte, TiO2). The partial or total covering of the substrate by a dielectric medium causes a modification of the Mott-Schottky plot of the bare substrate. We provide a mapping of the various Mott-Schottky curves that will appear depending on the film characteristics. If the dielectric nanoparticles completely block part of the substrate surface, the slope of the Mott-Schottky plot increases (with the same apparent flatband potential! as an effect of area reduction. The covering of a significant fraction of the surface by a thin dielectric layer shifts the apparent flatband negatively. Measurements on several TiO2 nanostructured electrodes show that the capacitance contribution of the semiconductor network in the dielectric state is very low, indicating that the field lines penetrate little into the TiO2 network, not much further than the first particle. The different surface covering observed for rutile-anatase and pure anatase colloids is explained by lattice matching rules with the substrate. By comparing different electrodes, the Helmholtz capacitance at the SnO2( F)/solution interface was calculated and the apparent flatband potential was corrected for the effect of band unpinning. (C) 2003 The Electrochemical Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available