4.5 Article

Effects of boric acid supplementation on bone histomorphometry, metabolism, and biomechanical properties in aged female F-344 rats

Journal

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
Volume 93, Issue 1-3, Pages 155-169

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/BTER:93:1-3:155

Keywords

bone mineral density; bone strength; boron; 17 beta-estradiol; ovariectomy; osteocalcin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Postmenopausal women may benefit from dietary interventions in order to increase bone strength and prevent fractures. Dietary boron (B) may be beneficial for optimal calcium metabolism and, as a consequence, optimal bone metabolism. The present study evaluated the effects of boron, in the form of boric acid, with or without 17beta-estradiol (E-2) supplementation (via subcutaneous implant), in ovariectomized (OVX) aged 13-mo-old F-344 rats. Boric acid was administered by gavage at a subtoxic dose (8.7 mg B/kg/d) for 40 d. Results indicate that serum level of minerals as well as osteocalcin (a marker of bone resorption) are dependent to a greater extent on the hormonal status of the animals than on boron supplementation. Boron treatment increased the E-2-induced elevation of urinary calcium and magnesium. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the L5 vertebra and proximal femur was highest in the E-2-treated groups; no increase in BMD was conferred by boron treatment. By histomorphometry of the proximal tibial metaphysis, osteoblastic, osteoid, and eroded surfaces were significantly suppressed by E-2 treatment, but not by boron treatment. In biomechanical testing of femur and vertebra, neither E-2 nor boron treatment significantly increased bone strength. At the levels given, boron alone provided no protection against OVX-induced osteopenia. In addition, combination therapy (B+E-2) provided no additional benefits over those of 17beta-estradiol treatment alone in this aged rat model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available