4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Improvement of IBAD MgO template layers on metallic substrates for YBCO HTS deposition

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 2651-2654

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2003.811937

Keywords

coated conductor; high-temperature superconductor; ion-beam assisted deposition; magnesium oxide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present our results to improve ion beam assisted deposition (IBAD) of magnesia (MgO) templates for subsequent YBa2Cu3O7-delta (YBCO) deposition. The substrate surface roughness has a significant effect on the initial nucleation texture of MAD MgO films. We have found that reduction in our substrate surface roughness to similar to 3.5 nm has resulted in better in-plane texture for IBAD MgO films than those deposited on rougher metal substrates. We have further improved the IBAD MgO deposition parameters by using an in situ reflected high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) analysis tool that allows for monitoring of IBAD MgO growth. We have found a direct correlation between the RHEED generated intensity versus time curve and in-plane texture. Utilizing X-ray diffraction analysis, we have been able to determine the optimum deposition parameters to routinely grow films in batch mode that have a phi scan 00 from 6-7degrees. Coupling the improvements in substrate preparation with optimization of IBAD MgO deposition has allowed for both batch and continuous deposition (termed c-IBAD MgO) on metallic substrates that result in superior superconducting properties. We have demonstrated that deposited meter lengths have had phi scan FWHM values from 8-9degrees with +/-10% uniformity. Additionally, we have been able to widen the processing zone in our system and coat two, one-meter lengths simultaneously while preserving good texture quality (Deltaphi(ave) similar to 8degrees) and uniformity (60-80% of tape length within +/-5% of Deltaphi(ave)) for both tapes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available