4.7 Article

Oxidant generation predominates around calcifying foci and enhances progression of aortic valve calcification

Journal

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 463-470

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.156745

Keywords

calcification; atherosclerosis; antioxidants; valves; free radicals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective - We hypothesized that reactive oxygen species ( ROS) contribute to progression of aortic valve ( AV) calcification/ stenosis. Methods and Results - We investigated ROS production and effects of antioxidants tempol and lipoic acid ( LA) in calcification progression in rabbits given 0.5% cholesterol diet +10(4) IU/d Vit.D-2 for 12 weeks. Superoxide and H2O2 microfluorotopography and 3-nitrotyrosine immunoreactivity showed increased signals not only in macrophages but preferentially around calcifying foci, in cells expressing osteoblast/ osteoclast, but not macrophage markers. Such cells also showed increased expression of NAD(P) H oxidase subunits Nox2, p22phox, and protein disulfide isomerase. Nox4, but not Nox1 mRNA, was increased. Tempol augmented whereas LA decreased H2O2 signals. Importantly, AV calcification, assessed by echocardiography and histomorphometry, decreased 43% to 70% with LA, but increased with tempol (P <= 0.05). Tempol further enhanced apoptosis and Nox4 expression. In human sclerotic or stenotic AV, we found analogous increases in ROS production and NAD(P) H oxidase expression around calcifying foci. An in vitro vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) calcification model also exhibited increased, catalase-inhibitable, calcium deposit with tempol, but not with LA. Conclusions - Our data provide evidence that ROS, particularly hydrogen peroxide, potentiate AV calcification progression. However, tempol exhibited a paradoxical effect, exacerbating AV/vascular calcification, likely because of its induced increase in peroxide generation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available