4.5 Article

Carbon balance of afforested peatland in Scotland

Journal

FORESTRY
Volume 76, Issue 3, Pages 299-317

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/76.3.299

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The annual net CO2 exchange over undisturbed deep peatland in Scotland was measured continuously for 22 months using eddy covariance. Annual CO2 exchanges over peatlands that had been drained, ploughed and afforested with conifers 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9 and 26 years previously were estimated by extrapolating two to four weekly measurements, using relationships between daytime fluxes and solar radiation and night-time fluxes and air temperature. The contribution of the trees to the overall net CO2 flux was estimated using a carbon accounting model, calibrated to fit conifer volume yield data. The carbon exchange of the peat and ground vegetation was then the difference between the overall carbon flux and the amount accumulated in trees and tree litter. The undisturbed peat accumulated similar to0.25 t C ha(-1) a(-1). Newly drained peatland (2-4 years after ploughing) emitted between 2 and 4 t C ha(-1) a(-1), but when ground vegetation recolonized, the peatland became a sink again, absorbing similar to3 t C ha(-1) a(-1) 4-8 years after tree planting. Thereafter, the trees dominated the budget and afforested peatlands absorbed up to 5 t C ha(-1) a(-1). Assuming that the trees accumulated carbon at rates commensurate with yield class 10 m(3) ha(-1) a(-1), the peat beneath the trees after canopy closure was estimated to be decomposing at only similar to1 t C ha(-1) a(-1) or less. This is slower than previously thought and suggested that afforested peatlands in Scotland accumulate more carbon in trees, litter, forest soil and products than is lost from the peat for 90-190 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available