Journal
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 779-793Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/713610009
Keywords
metal; bioaccumulation; food; toxicity; risk; behavior
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Ecological risk assessments are likely to be more effective if they are built upon knowledge of from where and in what manner animals take tip contaminants. We discuss the relative importance of various metal sources for aquatic invertebrates. First, we address the question do sediment-dwelling animals take up their metals from the overlying water compartment or the sediment compartment or both (both compartments include water and particles). We find that the overlying water column is more important as a metal source for insects, whereas the sediment compartment is more important for oligochaete worms. We explain this tendency by the behaviors of the animals involved. Second, we ask the question do animals take up their metals from food or water within a given compartment. Through case studies on three widespread freshwater invertebrates, we conclude that for some predatory insects food is their major source of several metals, whereas for the crustacean Hyalella both food and water appear to be important depending on the metal involved and the experimental protocol used to study the question. We conclude that ignoring food as a metal source could severely underestimate metal exposures for some animals. We suggest that integrating these complexities into laboratory tests and risk assessment protocols will improve their meaningfulness and thus their ability to protect aquatic ecosystems.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available