4.5 Article

Solid variant of aneurysmal bone cysts in long tubular bones: Giant cell reparative granuloma

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume 180, Issue 6, Pages 1681-1687

Publisher

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.6.1801681

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the age distribution, location, and imaging features of histologically proven solid variants of aneurysmal bone cysts in long tubular bones. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective review of imaging studies of histologically proven solid aneurysmal bone cysts in long bones between 1961 and 2001. There were 30 cases comprising 29 radiographic, six CT, and eight MR imaging examinations. The lesions were evaluated for bone involved, location within a long bone, matrix, size, soft-tissue mass, and MR imaging characteristics. The imaging findings were correlated with the histologic findings. RESULTS. The patients were 17 females and 13 males ranging in age from 2 to 58 years (mean, 18 years). The bones involved were the femur (n = 10), the ulna (n = 7), the tibia (n = 7), the humerus (n = 2), the radius (n = 2), and the fibula (n = 2). The lesions were five juxtaarticular, 13 metaphyseal, one diametaphyseal, and 11 diaphyseal. The location was eccentric in 20 cases, of which two were intracortical and two periosteal, and central in 10. Lesion size varied between 1 and 7 cm. Thirty-three percent of lesions were nonaneurysmal. Four lesions were mineralized. A soft-tissue mass was present in four cases. Four lesions showed a permeative-lytic pattern simulating a malignant process. Unusual findings included periosteal reaction and development of a solid aneurysmal bone cyst in a preexisting fracture. MR imaging showed solid elements in all cases and pronounced edema in 50% of cases. CONCLUSION. Solid aneurysmal bone cyst is a reactive nonneoplastic bone lesion with varied imaging characteristics; one third of lesions are nonaneurysmal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available