4.5 Article

The effects of improved strength on obstacle negotiation in community-living older adults

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 273-283

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00101-7

Keywords

gait; resistance training; kinematics; kinetics; obstructed gait tasks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poor mobility has been associated with age-related deterioration in muscle strength. While previous work has examined the effects of improved strength on level walking, we have quantified the effects of a resistance-training program on obstructed gait tasks using biomechanical-dependent measures. Forty-five community-dwelling participants aged 62 years or older were randomised to either a control (n = 16) or experimental group (n = 29). The experimental subjects exercised for 24 weeks on a progressive resistance-training program designed to improve lower body strength. Dynamic strength was assessed at weeks 0 and 24 as well as specific laboratory gait kinetics and kinematics during stepping over an obstacle and negotiation of a raised surface set at 10, 20 and 30% of each subject's leg length. Significant strength improvements (P < 0.05), ranging between 197 and 285%, were recorded in the experimental group. The strength gains in the experimental group were accompanied by significant increases in obstacle-crossing stride velocity (range 5.5-15.5%) due to increases in stride length and decreases in stride duration for both gait tasks. Significant changes in the peak vertical and anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as well as in kinematic variables associated with a safe obstacle traverse such as vertical obstacle heel clearance, limb flexion at obstacle crossing, horizontal foot placement and vertical landing velocity resulted in an improved crossing strategy in the experimental subjects. These findings provide evidence of significant improvements in obstructed gait function of community-living older adults associated with a systematic resistance-training program. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available