Journal
PAIN
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages 237-248Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00451-7
Keywords
laser evoked potentials; P2; novelty-P3; P3a; P3b; involuntary orientation of attention
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Laser evoked potentials (LEPs) are nociceptive-related brain responses to activation of cutaneous nociceptors by laser radiant heat stimuli. We previously showed that LEP amplitude during the P2 period (similar to400 ms) was increased by rare noxious stimuli, inside and outside the focus of spatial attention. It was postulated that this effect reflected a P3a response indexing an involuntary shift of attention. In the present study, LEPs were recorded in a three-stimulus oddball paradigm, commonly used to evoke P3a (or novelty-P3). CO2 laser-induced noxious stimuli were delivered on one hand (80%, frequent). Two series of rare stronger-intensity deviant stimuli were randomly intermixed: target stimuli (10%) were delivered on the same hand while distractor stimuli (10%) were delivered on the other hand. Subjects were instructed to count targets. During an additional session, strong stimuli were delivered alone on one hand without instruction (100%, no-task stimuli). All stimulus types evoked a first positivity around 360 ms (P360). Targets and distractors elicited a late positive complex (LPC) around 465500 ms. Topography of LPC to distractors was central and significantly more anterior than that of LPC to targets. Distractor LPC corresponds to P3a (or novelty-P3) indexing an involuntary orientation of attention toward an unexpected new/deviant event. It suggests that at least an early part of the LEP positivity (P360) is independent of P3-activities. (C) 2002 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available