4.6 Article

Elastic fiber production in cardiovascular tissue-equivalents

Journal

MATRIX BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 339-350

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0945-053X(03)00052-0

Keywords

elastin; fibrillin; tissue engineering; fibrin; smooth muscle cell

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [1R01 HL60495] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elastic fiber incorporation is critical to the success of tissue-engineered arteries and heart valves. Elastic fibers have not yet been observed in tissue-engineered replacements fabricated in vitro with smooth muscle cells. Here, rat smooth muscle cells (SMC) or human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) remodeled collagen or fibrin gels for 4 weeks as the basis for a completely biological cardiovascular tissue replacement. Immunolabeling, alkaline extraction and amino acid analysis identified and quantified elastin. Organized elastic fibers formed when neonatal SMC were cultured in fibrin gel. Fibrillin-1 deposition occurred but elastin was detected in regions without fibrillin-1, indicating that a microfibril template is not required for elastic fiber formation within fibrin. Collagen did not support substantial elastogenesis by SMC. The quantity of crosslinked elastic fibers was enhanced by treatment with TGF-beta1 and insulin, concomitant with increased collagen production. These additives overcame ascorbate's inhibition of elastogenesis in fibrin. The elastic fibers that formed in fibrin treated with TGF-beta1 and insulin contained crosslinks, as evidenced by the presence of desmosine and an altered elastin labeling pattern when beta-aminopropionitrile (BAPN) was added. These findings indicate that in vitro elastogenesis can be achieved in tissue engineering applications, and they suggest a physiologically relevant model system for the study of three-dimensional elastic structures. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V./Intemational Society of Matrix Biology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available