4.4 Article

Chromosomal instability in pancreatic ductal cells from patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Journal

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 201-206

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.10189

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA74184] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [T32 DK07742] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a disease with high mortality for which chronic pancreatitis confers a markedly increased risk. We hypothesize that chromosome instability and genomic damage occur in pre-neoplastic pancreatic ductal epithelium, and that this damage may be related to oxidative stress. We used dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization with centromere probes and locus-specific arm probes for chromosome arms 11q, 17p, and 18q to identify genomic instability in cultures of normal-appearing human pancreatic ductal epithelium from normal organ donor controls compared to patients with chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic adenocarcinoma. To examine early pancreatic tumorigenesis, we studied only normal-appearing pancreatic ductal cells adjacent to pancreatitis or carcinoma. We found that, compared to the finding in normal controls, chromosomal abnormalities are present in normal-appearing human pancreatic ductal epithelia obtained from patients with chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, these chromosomal abnormalities could be induced in cultured pancreatic ductal epithelium from normal organ donors by chronic exposure to dilute hydrogen peroxide, suggesting that oxidative stress may contribute to the development of chromosomal instability in the pancreas. These results elucidate a potential mechanism linking chronic pancreatitis to pancreatic cancer and suggest that chromosomal instability may be an early event in the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available