4.5 Article

Different frequencies of Streptococcus anginosus infection in oral cancer and esophageal cancer

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages 492-496

Publisher

JAPANESE CANCER ASSOC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01471.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple cancers frequently occur in the upper aerodigestive tract. The high incidence rate of multiple carcinomas in this region is often explained in terms of involvement of the same underlying risk factors. It has been reported that the oral bacterium Streptococcus anginosus (S. anginosus) is associated with esophageal, gastric, and pharyngeal cancer tissues. In this study, a highly specific quantification method for S. anginosus DNA using real-time PCR was established. We employed this assay to determine whether S. anginosus is also associated with oral cancer tissues. This precise quantification method revealed different degrees of infection with S. anginosus in esophageal cancer and oral cancer. We assayed 10 ng of genomic DNA from cancer tissues, and found that eight of 18 samples (44%) from the esophagus contained a detectable level (>10 fg) of S. anginosus DNA, whereas this was the case for only five of 38 samples (13%) of oral cancer. The quantity of S. anginosus DNA in the esophageal cancer tissues was significantly higher than in oral cancer. The maximum amount of S. anginosus DNA was approximately ten times higher in esophageal than in oral cancer tissues. In addition, none of the five different oral cancer sites (floor of the mouth, mandibular gingival, maxillary gingival, buccal mucosal, and tongue) showed significant signs of S. anginosus infection. On the other hand, most non-cancerous tissues of the esophagus and tongue showed an undetectable level of S. anginosus. These results suggest that S. anginosus is associated with esophageal cancer, but is not closely related with oral cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available