4.7 Article

Genetic markers for the efficacy of tumour necrosis factor blocking therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages 526-529

Publisher

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.6.526

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis ( RA) is a genetically complex disease where the response to different treatments varies greatly between different patients. This is the case with the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blocking agents, where 20-40% of patients have been described as non-responders. No predictive markers exist as yet for the prognosis of response. Objective: To analyse whether polymorphisms of several cytokine genes are associated with the responsiveness to TNF blockade with etanercept. Methods: 123 patients with active RA were treated with etanercept and response rates were determined after three months using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 and disease activity score (DAS) 28 response criteria. Genotyping was done for TNF (-308 TNFA), interleukin (IL) 10 (-1087 IL10), transforming growth factor (TGF)beta1 (codon 25 TGFB1), and IL1 receptor antagonist ( intron 2 IL1RN). Results: 24 patients (20%) were defined as non-responders owing to their failure to fulfil any of the ACR20 or DAS28 response criteria. None of the recorded alleles was alone significantly associated with responsiveness to treatment. However, a certain combination of alleles (-308 TNF1/TNF1 and -1087 G/G) was associated with good responsiveness to etanercept (p<0.05). In addition, a combination of alleles influencing interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL1Ra) and TGFβ1 production (A2 allele for IL1RN and rare C allele in codon 25 of TGFB1 gene) was associated with non-responsiveness (p<0.05). Conclusion: Genetic polymorphisms, which may influence the balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines of relevance for the course of RA, are associated with clinical responsiveness to etanercept treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available