4.6 Article

Induction of pathogenic sets of genes in macrophages and neurons in neuroAIDS

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 162, Issue 6, Pages 2041-2057

Publisher

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64336-2

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR13150] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH62261, P30 MH062261, R01 MH061692-01A2, R01 MH059468, MH61224, MH59468, R01 MH061692, MH61692, R01 MH061692-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The etiology of the central nervous system (CNS) alterations after human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, such as dementia and encephalitis, remains unknown. We have used microarray analysis in a monkey model of neuroAIDS to identify 98 genes, many previously unrecognized in lentiviral CNS pathogenesis, whose expression is significantly upregulated in the frontal lobe of simian immunodeficiency virus-infected brains. Further, through immunohistochemical. illumination, distinct classes of genes were found whose protein products localized to infiltrating macrophages, endothelial cells and resident glia, such as CD163, Glut5, and ISG15. In addition we found proteins Induced in cortical neurons (ie, cyclin D3, tissue transglutaminase, alpha1-antichymotrypsin, and STAT1), which have not previously been described as participating in simian immunodeficiency virus or HIV-related CNS pathology. This molecular phenotyping in the infected brains revealed pathways promoting entry of macrophages into the brain and their subsequent detrimental effects on neurons. These data support the hypothesis that in HIV-induced CNS disease products of activated macrophages and astrocytes lead to CNS dysfunction by directly damaging neurons, as well as by induction of altered gene and protein expression profiles in neurons themselves which are deleterious to their function. (Am J Pathol 2003, 162:2041-2057)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available