4.1 Article

Clinical and Pathological Discrepancies and Cardiovascular Findings in 409 Consecutive Autopsies

Journal

ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages 449-452

Publisher

ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS CARDIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/S0066-782X2011005000111

Keywords

Cardiovascular diseases; autopsy; diagnostic; clinical diagnosis; dause of death

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses persists worldwide. Objective: We evaluated autopsies in a university hospital in order to assess the accuracy of clinical cardiovascular diagnosis compared to postmortem findings. Methods: Four hundred nine consecutive autopsies between 2003 and 2006 were analyzed in a tertiary-care hospital in Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. The comparison of clinic-pathological cardiovascular findings was performed using Goldman's discrepancies classification. Results: Autopsy rate at the hospital was 8%. Cardiovascular causes of death represented 42.8% (175 out of 409 patients) of autopsy diagnoses. In 98 (56%) patients, there were major discrepancies (class I and II), representing a large proportion of misdiagnoses for mesenteric infarction (84.6%), acute myocardial infarction (64.7%), aorta dissection (64.2%), and pulmonary embolism (62.5%). Highest concordance rates were observed in congestive heart failure (59%) and acute ischemic stroke (58.8%). Age, sex, length of stay and the last admission unit at the hospital were not associated with Goldman criteria. Conclusions: Clinic-autopsy discrepancies concerning cardiovascular death remain high in Brazil, despite technological resources available. Moreover, our findings reinforce the importance of postmortem examination in contributing to medical care improvement. (Arq Bras Cardiol 2011;97(6):449-453)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available