4.5 Article

Response toward novel foods and novel objects in wild Cebus apella

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 653-675

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023700800113

Keywords

tufted capuchins; neophobia; exploration; responsiveness

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animals respond to novel stimuli via explorative or neophobic behavior or both. The coexistence of these responses toward novel foods may be a successful adaptive strategy for a generalist species such as Cebus apella, because it allows the gradual introduction of new foods into the diet and reduces the risk of poisoning by ingestion of large amounts of toxic compounds (Glander, 1982; Milton, 1993; Visalberghi, 1994). Neophobia has been studied mostly in captivity. We investigated responsiveness to novelty in a group of 25-30 wild tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) in Iguazu National Park (Argentina). They had been habituated to visiting sites where bananas were provided on three elevated platforms. We presented novel stimuli on an adjacent platform. There were 4 experimental conditions with 10 sessions each: the Novel Food condition, the Novel Object condition, the Control condition, in which the platform was empty, and the Banana condition. In the Novel Food and Novel Object conditions, a new stimulus-food or object-was on the platform during each session. The Banana condition provided information on capuchin response to a familiar preferred food. Overall, capuchins were less responsive toward novel objects than toward novel foods; however, although cautious, they ate small amounts of the novel foods. Age affected individual responsiveness toward novel foods, whereas sex affected responsiveness toward novel objects. Capuchins ignored the empty platform. Our findings are in agreement with the idea that tufted capuchins can adapt to new habitats by gradually exploiting new food sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available