4.5 Article

Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry with NanoLC/microelectrospray ionization and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization: Analytical performance in peptide mass fingerprint analysis

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1016/S1044-0305(03)00138-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein identifications by peptide mass fingerprint analyses with Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) were performed using microelectrospray ionization coupled to nano liquid chromatography (NanoLC), as well as using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI). Tryptic digests of bovine serum albumin (BSA), diluted down to femtomole quantities, have been desalted by fast NanoLC under isocratic elution conditions as the high resolving power of FT-ICR MS enables peptides to be separated during the mass analysis stage of the experiment. The high mass accuracy achieved with FT-ICR MS (a few ppm with external calibration) facilitated unambiguous protein identification from protein database searches, even when only a few tryptic peptides of a protein were detected. Statistical confidence in the database search results was further improved by internal calibration due to increased mass accuracy. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization and micro electrospray ionization (ESI) FT-TCR showed good mass accuracies in the low femtomole range, yet a better sensitivity was observed with MALDI. However, in higher femtomole ranges slightly lower mass accuracies were observed with MALDI FT-ICR than with microESI FT-ICR due to scan-to-scan variations of the ion population in the ICR cell. Database search results and protein sequence coverage results from NanoLC FT-ICR MS and MALDI FT-ICR MS, as well as the effect of mass accuracy on protein identification for the peptide mass fingerprint analysis are evaluated. (J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2003, 14, 553-561) (C) 2003 American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available