4.6 Article

Continent lower urinary tract reconstruction in the cervical spinal cord injured population

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 169, Issue 6, Pages 2184-2187

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000061761.24504.47

Keywords

urinary diversion; catheterization; bladder, neurogenic; spinal cord injuries; urinary incontinence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Patients with cervical spinal cord injury and upper extremity dysfunction are treated primarily with indwelling or condom catheters. We present our experience with a select group of patients with limited upper extremity function to determine long-term success and patient satisfaction after lower urinary tract reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Between May 1988 and November 1996, 28 patients with cervical spinal cord injury underwent lower urinary tract reconstruction. Postoperative information was obtained on 21 patients. Charts were reviewed and patients were contacted by an independent reviewer to ascertain patient satisfaction and quality of life. Patient age was 17 to 51 years (average 34.6). Reconstructive procedures requiring catheterization included augmentation ileocystoplasty in 4 patients plus Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy in 7, a Kock ileal reservoir in 8 and an Indiana pouch in 2. Results: Catheterization was regularly performed by 20 of the 21 patients (95%). A total of 12 patients (60%) performed self-intermittent catheterization and 8 (40%) relied on an attendant or family member. Of the patients 80% reported improved quality of life since reconstruction, citing such reasons as lack of a need for urinary drainage bags, increased freedom and an improved sense of body image. Using a visual analog scale to grade satisfaction from 1 to 10 (1-extremely unsatisfied to 10-extremely satisfied) 14 patients (67%) reported a score of 8 or more. Conclusions: With appropriate preoperative selection of the cervical spinal cord injured patient intermittent catheterization is successfully maintained in the long term, allowing greater flexibility in choice, and a resultant high level of patient satisfaction and improved quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available