4.7 Article

Reduced expression of Axin correlates with tumour progression of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 88, Issue 11, Pages 1734-1739

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600941

Keywords

Axin; oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; carcinogenesis; immunohistochemistry; single nucleotide polymorphism

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Axin is a negative regulator of the Wnt signalling pathway, and genetic alterations of AXIN1 have been suggested to be an important factor of carcinogenesis in some tumours. The objective of this study was to clarify the clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of Axin in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma ( SCC). Immunohistochemical staining for Axin was performed on surgical specimens obtained from 81 patients with oesophageal SCC. Western and Northern blottings were performed on proteins and RNA from oesophageal SCC cell lines. Then polymerase chain reaction - single- strand conformational analysis ( PCR - SSCP) was performed on DNA from oesophageal SCC patients and cell lines. Axin expression was found to be correlated inversely with depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and lymphatic invasion. Although univariate analysis showed Axin to be a negative predictor, multivariate analysis showed that it was not an independent prognostic marker. In all but one of the seven cell lines examined, the levels of protein expression were equivalent to RNA expression. PCR - SSCP showed that five patients and three cell lines had polymorphisms in exon 4 or 5 of the AXIN1 gene, but none of the 81 patients with oesophageal SCC had mutations. Our findings suggest that reduced expression of Axin is correlated with tumour progression of oesophageal SCC. However, additional studies will be necessary to elucidate the mechanism responsible for loss of Axin expression in tumour cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available