4.7 Article

Antimutagenicity of supercritical CO2 extracts of Terminalia catappa leaves and cytotoxicity of the extracts to human hepatoma cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 51, Issue 12, Pages 3564-3567

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf034102v

Keywords

antimutagenicity; Terminalia catappa; supercritical fluid extraction (SFE); Ames test; cytotoxicity; human hepatoma; Chang liver cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural antimutagens may prevent cancer and are therefore of great interest to oncologists and the public at large. Phytochemicals are potent antimutagen candidates. When the Ames test was applied to examine the antimutagenic potency of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) extracts of Terminalia catappa leaves at a dose of 0.5 mg/plate, toxicity and mutagenicity were not detected. The antimutagenic activity of SC-CO2 extracts increased with decreases of temperature (60, 50, and 40 degreesC) and pressure (4000, 3000, and 2000 psi) used for extraction. The most potent antimutagenicity was observed in extracts obtained at 40 degreesC and 2000 psi. At a dose of 0.5 mg of extract/plate, approximately 80% of the mutagenicity of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P, with S-9) and 46% of the mutagenicity of N-methyl-N'-nitroguanidine (MNNG, without S-9) were inhibited. Media supplemented with SC-CO2 extracts at a range of 0-500 mug/mL were used to cultivate human hepatoma (Huh 7) and normal liver (Chang liver) cells. The viability of the cells was assayed by measuring cellular acid phosphatase activity. A dose-dependent growth inhibition of both types of cells was observed. The SC-CO2 extracts were more cytotoxic to Huh 7 cells than to Chang liver cells. The observation that SC-CO2 extracts of T. catappa leaves did not induce mutagenicity at the doses tested while exhibiting potent antimutagenicity and were more cytotoxic to human hepatoma cells than to normal liver cells is of merit and warrants further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available