4.7 Article

Obscured asymptotic giant branch variables in the Large Magellanic Cloud and the period-luminosity relation

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 342, Issue 1, Pages 86-104

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06514.x

Keywords

stars : AGB and post-AGB; stars : carbon; stars : mass-loss; stars : variables : other; Magellanic Clouds; infrared : stars

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The characteristics of oxygen-rich and carbon-rich, large-amplitude (DeltaK > 0.4 mag), asymptotic giant branch (AGB) variables in the Large Magellanic Clouds are discussed, with an emphasis on those obscured by dust. Near-infrared photometry, obtained over about 8 yr, is combined with published mid-infrared observations from IRAS and ISO to determine bolometric magnitudes for 42 stars. Pulsation periods of the O-rich stars are in the range 116 < P < 1393 d, while those for C-rich stars have 298 < P < 939 d. in addition to the regular pulsations, one O-rich star and four C-rich stars show large-amplitude, Delta K > 0.6 mag, secular or very long-period variations, which may be associated with changes in, their mass-loss rates. We discuss and compare various methods of determining the bolometric magnitudes and show, perhaps surprisingly, that most of the very long-period stars seem to follow an extrapolation of the period-luminosity relation determined for stars with shorter periods - although the details do depend on how the bolometric magnitudes are calculated. Three stars with thin shells, which are clearly more luminous than the obscured AGB stars, are undergoing hot bottom burning, while other stars with similar luminosities have yet to be investigated in sufficient detail to determine their status in this regard. We suggest that an apparent change in slope of the period-luminosity relation around 400-420 d is caused by variables with luminosities brighter than the predictions of the core-mass-luminosity relation, owing to excess flux from hot bottom burning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available