4.7 Article

Cosmological constraints from the local X-ray luminosity function of the most X-ray-luminous galaxy clusters

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 342, Issue 1, Pages 287-298

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06550.x

Keywords

gravitational lensing; cosmological parameters; large-scale structure of Universe; X-rays : galaxies : clusters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present precise constraints on the normalization of the power spectrum of mass fluctuations in the nearby Universe, sigma(8), as a function,of the mean local matter density, Omega(m). Using the observed local X-ray luminosity function of galaxy clusters from the extended BCS and REFLEX studies, a mass-luminosity relation determined from Chandra and ROSAT X-ray data and weak gravitational lensing observations, and the mass function predicted by the Hubble Volume simulations of Evrard et al., we obtain sigma(8) = (0.508 +/- 0.019) Omega(m)(-(0.253 +/- 0.024)) with Omega(m) < 0.34 at 68 per cent confidence. The degeneracy between sigma(8) and Omega(m) can be broken using Chandra measurements of the X-ray gas mass fractions in dynamically relaxed clusters. Using this information and including Gaussian priors on the mean baryon density of the Universe and the Hubble constant, we obtain sigma(8) = 0.695 +/- 0.042 and Omega(m) = 0.287 +/- 0.036, for an assumed flat Lambda-cold dark matter cosmology (marginalized 68 per cent confidence limits). Our results are in good agreement with some recent studies based on the local X-ray temperature function of clusters, the redshift evolution of the X-ray luminosity and temperature functions of clusters, early results from the Sloan Digitized Sky Survey, the most recent results from studies of cosmic shear, and combined analyses of the 2dF galaxy redshift survey and cosmic microwave background anisotropies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available