4.5 Article

The SH4-Unique-SH3-SH2 domains dictate specificity in signaling that differentiate c-Yes from c-Src

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 116, Issue 12, Pages 2585-2598

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00466

Keywords

Yes; Src; actin filaments; SH4 domain; unique domain

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA60731] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR16440] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [1T32ES10953] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

c-Src and c-Yes are highly homologous. members of the Src family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases. The overall sequence similarity between c-Src and c-Yes allows them to perform many overlapping functions. However, the phenotypes of the c-src and c-yes knockout mice, and cells derived from them, are quite different, indicating functional specificity between the two proteins. Specifically, C-Src(-/-) cells are deficient in several processes that require dynamic regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. In order to begin to understand why c-Yes is unable to compensate for c-Src signaling, we used a series of Src/Yes chimeras in which the non-catalytic functional domains of Src(527F) were replaced by those of c-Yes. Using chicken embryo fibroblasts as a model system, our results indicate that the c-Yes N-terminal SH4-Unique domains are sufficient to inhibit the ability of Src527F to alter cell morphology, induce actin filament rearrangements or stimulate motility or invasive potential. The data also indicate that the SH4Unique-SH3-SH2 domains of c-Yes work cooperatively and prevent activation of signaling proteins associated with Src527F transformation, including activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, phosphorylation of c-Raf and Akt and downregulation of RhoA-GTP. These data indicate that c-Yes may not modulate signals associated with c-Src-induced changes in actin filament integrity and may explain why c-Yes fails to compensate for c-Src signaling in src(-/-) cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available