4.7 Article

Studies on the electrochemical and permeation characteristics of asymmetric charged porous membranes

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 262, Issue 2, Pages 566-573

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00131-0

Keywords

charged porous membranes; membrane potential; membrane permeability; tortuosity factor; salt permeability; equivalent pore radius; nonequilibrium thermodynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Asymmetric charged porous membranes were prepared by imbedding 10% (W/W) ion-exchange resin in cellulose acetate binder. Membrane potential and conductance measurements have been carried out in sodium chloride solutions at different concentrations to investigate the relationship between concentration of fixed charges and electrochemical properties of developed nonselective cation- and anion-exchange membranes. Counterion transport number and permselectivity of these membranes were found to vary due to the presence of ion-exchange resin. The hydrodynamic and electroosmotic permeability of sodium chloride solutions has been studied in order to compute equivalent pore radius. For cation- and anion-exchange membranes good agreement was observed between pore radius values estimated from hydrodynamic and electroosmotic permeability coefficient separately, while for nonselective membranes no correlation was found. Membrane conductance data, along with values of concentration of fixed charges, were used for the estimation of the tortuosity factor, salt permeability coefficient, and frictional coefficient between solute and membrane matrix employing an interpretation by nonequilibrium thermodynamic principles based on frictional forces. Moreover, surface morphological studies of these membranes also have been carried out and the membranes were found to be reasonably homogeneous. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available