4.7 Article

Partitioning net ecosystem carbon exchange into net assimilation and respiration using 13CO2 measurements:: A cost-effective sampling strategy -: art. no. 1070

Journal

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2002GB001995

Keywords

global change; carbon cycle; carbon isotopes; biosphere/atmosphere interactions; forest

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] The current emphasis on global climate studies has led the scientific community to set up a number of sites for measuring the long-term biosphere-atmosphere net CO2 exchange ( net ecosystem exchange, NEE). Partitioning this flux into its elementary components, net assimilation (F-A), and respiration ( F-R), remains necessary in order to get a better understanding of biosphere functioning and design better surface exchange models. Noting that F-R and F-A have different isotopic signatures, we evaluate the potential of isotopic (CO2)-C-13 measurements in the air ( combined with CO2 flux and concentration measurements) to partition NEE into F-R and F-A on a routine basis. The study is conducted at a temperate coniferous forest where intensive isotopic measurements in air, soil, and biomass were performed in summer 1997. The multilayer soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer model MuSICA is adapted to compute (CO2)-C-13 flux and concentration profiles. Using MuSICA as a perfect'' simulator and taking advantage of the very dense spatiotemporal resolution of the isotopic data set ( 341 flasks over a 24-hour period) enable us to test each hypothesis and estimate the performance of the method. The partitioning works better in midafternoon when isotopic disequilibrium is strong. With only 15 flasks, i.e., two (CO2)-C-13 nighttime profiles (to estimate the isotopic signature of F-R) and five daytime measurements ( to perform the partitioning) we get mean daily estimates of F-R and F-A that agree with the model within 15 - 20%. However, knowledge of the mesophyll conductance seems crucial and may be a limitation to the method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available