4.6 Article

Metabolic engineering of Lactobacillus fermentum for production of mannitol and pure L-lactic acid or pyruvate

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages 653-663

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/bit.10615

Keywords

mannitol; mannitol dehydrogenase; metabolic engineering; lactate dehydrogenase; lactate; pyruvate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For production of mannitol in combination with pure L-lactic acid or pyruvate, the D- and L-lactate dehydrogenase genes (IdhD and IdhL) of a mannitol-producing Lactobacillus fermentum strain were cloned and stepwise inactivated. For inactivation of both Idh genes by a gene replacement technique, deletion constructs removing a 0.4-kb fragment from the promoter and the 5' end region of the Idh genes were used. The first inactivation mutant, designated L. fermentum GRL1030, carried the deletion in IdhD (DeltaIdhD). A double mutant, DeltaIdhD-DeltaIdhL, was constructed by the inactivation of the IdhL gene of strain GRL1030, resulting in strain L. fermentum GRL1032. The correctness of the both mutants was confirmed at the DNA level by polymerase chain reaction, as shown by the absence of Idh transcripts by northern blotting and as a lack of the corresponding enzyme activity. In bioreactor cultivations, the single mutant GRL1030 produced mannitol and L-lactic acid as expected. Mannitol and lactic acid yields and productivities were practically unaffected by deletion of the IdhD gene. The double mutant GRL1032 produced mannitol and pyruvate as expected. However, although the yield of mannitol from fructose remained high, its volumetric productivity was reduced. The double mutation negatively affected the glucose consumption rate, resulting in reduced cellular growth. In addition to pyruvate, the double mutant produced 2,3-butanediol. More surprisingly, some lactic acid was still produced. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available