4.0 Article

Influence of the Application Rate of an Organic Amendment (Municipal Solid Waste [MSW] Compost) on Gypsum Quarry Rehabilitation in Semiarid Environments

Journal

ARID LAND RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 344-364

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15324982.2010.502920

Keywords

Atriplex halimus; gypsum quarries; MSW compost; organic amendment; rehabilitation; semiarid

Funding

  1. Compania Minera Fuente del Peral (Sorbas, Almeria, Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rehabilitation of open-cast gypsum mines is made difficult by the permanent loss of the original soil resource. Soil development can be accelerated by using organic amendments (e.g., MSW compost), which provide both physical (structural) enhancement and chemical (nutrient) reinforcement. Excess of salts as a result of the effect of refuse application can lead to overfertilizing for some species and the species Atriplex halimus L. (Chenopodiaceae) can be considered an effective indicator of the optimum organic amendment rate. Four treatments of composted urban municipal solid waste (MSW compost) were applied to the top flat area of a gypsum spoil [soil-forming material (SFM)], being then the surface covered with natural topsoil layer coming from the head of the quarry. Soil and vegetation sampling was made over a four-year period. As a result of the physical and chemical effects of the organic amendment on soil properties, a close relationship existed between application rate and Atriplex halimus presence. Based on the results of this study, gypsum quarry rehabilitation in semiarid environments may be facilitated by the use of medium organic amendment rates. High rates caused halophyte species such as Atriplex halimus to grow in such a way that development of native gypsiferous species was hindered by the competitive processes. On the other hand, low rates seemed to have no beneficial effect on soil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available