4.0 Article

Storage Effects on Biochemical Properties of Air-Dried Soil Samples from Southeastern Spain

Journal

ARID LAND RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 213-222

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15324980903038727

Keywords

enzyme activities; mediterranean forest soils; microbial activity; microbial biomass; soil storage

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the government of Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil biochemical properties are susceptible to change under sample storage, and as a consequence, these properties have usually been determined in fresh samples, kept cold or frozen for brief periods of time. However, air-dried soil would facilitate routine soil testing procedures in soils from semi-arid Mediterranean areas, which have soil water deficit most of the year. This research aims at assessing the effects of medium-term soil storage (6-9 months) at room temperature on air-dried soil samples from two Mediterranean forest locations for the measurement of various microbiological and biochemical properties (microbial biomass carbon, basal respiration, metabolic quotient, acid phosphatase activity, urease activiy, -glucosidase activity, and soluble carbon). Storage of air-dried soil samples for 6 months had no significant effects on the studied properties in any location. With regard to samples stored for 9 months, we only found differences at the location with higher mean rainfall in the values of basal respiration, the metabolic quotient and -glucosidase, and urease activities. Our results show that biochemical properties from Mediterranean semi-arid soils, are medium-term stable in stored air-dried soil samples. Thus, these findings would encourage the selection of biochemical properties on a practical basis, as there is no strict requirement to determine these properties immediately after sampling, as they remain valid for several months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available