4.8 Article

Dynamic response of nitrifying activated sludge batch culture to increased chloride concentration

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 13, Pages 3125-3135

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00207-0

Keywords

nitrifying activated sludge batch cultures; chloride concentration; fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH); specific nitrification rate; dominant nitrifier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic response of nitrifying activated sludge batch cultures to increased chloride concentration was studied in this paper, which focused upon the changes in the specific nitrification rate (SNR) and nitrifier population when the chloride level was gradually or stepwise increased to 30,000 mg Cl L-1. The dominant species of ammonia-oxidizers and nitrite-oxidizers in the population were examined by Fluorescent in situ hybridization technique with 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. It was found that neither chloride increasing approaches affected the SNR of the batch cultures before the chloride concentration exceeded 10,000 mg Cl L-1, after which the stepwise increase approach reduced the SNR more significantly than the gradual increase approach. From 10,000 to 18,000 mg Cl L-1 a down-and-up pattern of the SNR variation appeared in both approaches, which was associated with the change in the dominant species of ammonia-oxidizers from non-saline-resistant species such as Nitrosomonas europaea-lineage and Nitrosomonas eutropha to saline-resistant species, such as the Nitrosococcus mobilis-lineage. Nitrobacter was the only dominant species when the chloride concentration was below 10,000 mg Cl L-1, where no nitrite-oxidizers survived. Therefore, the 10,000 mg Cl L-1 chloride level is a critical level for the shift of the nitrifier population in the nitrifying activated sludge batch cultures. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available