4.6 Article

The problems of penile urethroplasty with particular reference to 2-stage reconstructions

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 170, Issue 1, Pages 87-89

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000069721.20193.fd

Keywords

urethral stricture; reconstructive surgical procedures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We evaluate the anecdotal high revision rate of 2-stage urethroplasty. Materials and Methods: The short-term revision rates after 1-stage (139 cases) and 2-stage (103) urethroplasties were compared. Results: There were 4 revisions after 1-stage urethroplasty (4 of 139, 3%) and all involved the penile urethra (20%). The revision rate was 37.8% after stage 1 and 25.3% after stage 2 and of 2-stage urethroplasty 85%, involved the penile urethra. Conclusions: Although 2-stage has a significantly lower re-stricture rate than 1-stage urethroplasty for complex strictures in the penile urethra, it does so at the expense of a significantly higher revision rate particularly of the penile urethra.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available