4.7 Article

The phylogeographic importance of the Strait of Gibraltar as a gene flow barrier in terrestrial arthropods:: a case study with the scorpion Buthus occitanus as model organism

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 119-130

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00031-9

Keywords

scorpions; phylogeography; mtDNA; r18S/ITS-1; West-Mediterranean; Strait of Gibraltar; molecular clock

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phylogenetic relationship between Buthus occitanus populations across the Strait of Gibraltar was investigated using nuclear 18SATS-1 DNA sequences and mitochondrial 16S and COI DNA sequences. All analyses showed that the European samples are highly separated from North African samples, and also suggest the existence of three main groups within this species complex, i.e., an European, an Atlas ( = Moroccan samples) and a Tell-Atlas group ( = Tunisian samples). The European clade was subdivided into three distinct subclades. The application of a previous calibration of the molecular clock of another buthid species suggested that most of the detected mitochondrial DNA lineages including the European lineages are about three times older than the reopening of the Gibraltar Strait, and consequently, that other and older vicariant events are responsible for the observed phylogeographic structure of this species complex. Concerning the Moroccan samples, a discordance between nuclear and mitochondrial gene markers was observed. The 18S/ITS-1 gene tree could not resolve the phylogenctic relationships among the Moroccan B. occitanus subspecies and the closely related species B. atlantis, whereas mitochondrial genes suggested the co-existence of several old phylogenetic lineages in Morocco. We hypothesized that this difference may be explained by male-biased gene flow and gene conversion at the tandemly repeated 18S/ITS-1 gene regions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available