4.4 Article

The prevalence of subjective symptoms after exposure to arsenic in drinking water in Inner Mongolia, China

Journal

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 211-215

Publisher

JAPAN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2188/jea.13.211

Keywords

arsenic; drinking water; Inner Mongolia; subjective symptoms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In Inner Mongolia, China, more than 300,000 people are chronically exposed to arsenic via their drinking water. We have previously reported that the prevalence of arsenical dermatosis was as high as 40% in the Hetao Plain area. However, the association between exposure to arsenic in drinking water and adverse health effects has not been fully examined. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between exposure to arsenic and prevalence of subjective symptoms. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in 431 residents of an arsenic-affected village and 189 residents of an arsenic-free village in 1996. Health-related interviews and physical examinations were conducted. The odds ratio for each subjective symptom was estimated, comparing residents of arsenic-free and affected villages. Results: An arsenic level of 50+ mug/L was found in 90.6% of wells in the arsenic-affected village. Adjusted odds ratios of subjective symptoms, including coughs (odds ratio [OR]=12.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.4-25.6), stomachaches (OR=5.8, 95% CI: 3.6-9.4), palpitations (OR=3.6, 95% CI: 1.5-8.2), urination problems (OR=14.7, 95% CI: 3.3-65.5) and spontaneous abortions (OR=2.7, 95% CI: 0.8-8.4), were markedly higher amongst residents of the arsenic-affected village, including those without arsenic dermatosis. Conclusions: The present study shows a high prevalence of subjective symptoms amongst residents of an arsenic-affected village. Symptoms occurred in people with and without arsenic dermatosis. Our findings suggest that symptoms other than dermatosis should be considered when a clinical diagnosis of arsenic toxicosis is made.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available