4.7 Article

Fabrication and characterization of nanostructured anatase TiO2 films prepared by electrochemical anodization and their photocatalytic properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 651, Issue -, Pages 59-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.064

Keywords

TiO2 thin films; Anodization parameters; Surface morphology; Photocatalytic activity; Methylene blue

Funding

  1. State Planning Foundation (DPT) [2009.K120600]
  2. Dokuz Eylul University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, nanostructured anatase titanium dioxide (TiO2) films were fabricated by electrochemical anodization of titanium first, and then annealed at 500 degrees C for 2 h. Effect of electrolyte concentration, anodization time and electrolyte temperature on the surface morphology of the resulting TiO2 thin films were investigated. The phase structures, surface morphology and chemical composition were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The photocatalytic activity tests of the samples were evaluated by the degradation of aqueous methylene blue (MB) solutions under UV light illumination for different periods of time. The results showed that the structure of nanostructured TiO2 films depended strongly on the anodization parameters. It was found that there were micro-scale pores (<10 mu m) and nano-scale pores (diameter in the range from 40 to 70 nm) on the anodized titanium surfaces. This study indicated that structures, surface morphology, and surface area of the nanostructured anatase TiO2 films played an important role on their photocatalytic performance. The results clearly proved that nanostructured anatase TiO2 film prepared with optimum process parameters resulted in enhancement of the photocatalytic activity. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available