4.5 Review

Assessing pain objectively: the use of physiological markers

Journal

ANAESTHESIA
Volume 70, Issue 7, Pages 828-847

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13018

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFC-E)
  2. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  3. NAPP Pharmaceuticals
  4. TEVA-UK
  5. Welcome Trust
  6. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2011-18-019] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pain diagnosis and management would benefit from the development of objective markers of nociception and pain. Current research addressing this issue has focused on five main strategies, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. These encompass: (i) monitoring changes in the autonomic nervous system; (ii) biopotentials; (iii) neuroimaging; (iv) biological (bio-) markers; and (v) composite algorithms. Although each strategy has shown areas of promise, there are currently no validated objective markers of nociception or pain that can be recommended for clinical use. This article introduces the most important developments in the field and highlights shortcomings, with the aim of allowing the reader to make informed decisions about what trends to watch in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available