4.2 Article

Cystatin C for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in patients with spinal cord injury

Journal

ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 364-368

Publisher

ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1258/000456303766476995

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Serum creatinine is not a satisfactory marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) who have varying degrees of muscle atrophy. In contrast to serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, a 13-kDa protein, is not affected by muscle mass and is therefore potentially a useful marker of GFR in patients with SCI. In addition, cystatin C is not dependent on sex or age and is not secreted by the renal tubule. Aim We assessed serum cystatin C as a surrogate marker of GFR in SCI patients. Methods Cystatin C was analysed using a particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay (Dade Behring) in serum samples sent for routine measurement of creatinine (64 patients) and creatinine clearance (27 patients) from patients in the Spinal Unit of the Austin Health. We compared these results with serum cystatin C of 57 non-SCI patients who had had a creatinine clearance measurement during the study period. Results In patients with SCI, the reciprocal of cystatin C had a stronger correlation (r = 0.48, P < 0.01) with creatinine clearance than the reciprocal of serum creatinine (r = 0.25, P < 0.19). Further, the value of serum creatinine was much lower for a given creatinine clearance in SCI patients than in non-SCI patients; the serum cystatin C concentrations were equivalent. Conclusion The serum cystatin C is a convenient and more reliable surrogate marker of GFR than serum creatinine and will enable early detection of renal impairment. We need to confirm this finding with a larger study, including comparison with an accepted gold standard for GFR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available