4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Multitemporal repeat-pass SAR interferometry of boreal forests

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 1540-1550

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2003.813397

Keywords

borel forest; European Remote Sensing Satellite (ERS); Japanese Earth Resources Satellite (JERS); interferometric sythetic aperture radar (InSAR); multitemporal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multitemporal European Remote Sensing satellites 1 and 2 (ERS-1/2) and the Japanese Earth Resources Satellite 1 (JERS-1) interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data from a boreal forest test site in Sweden (stem volumes up to 335 m(3)/ha, equivalent to above-ground dry biomass of similar to200 tons/ha) are studied in order to estimate stem volume using coherence and backscatter. The changes of JERS-1 backscatter and ERS-1/2 tandem coherence between images are consistent over the area studied, in contrast to ERS-1/2 backscatter. A model-based regression analysis has been performed, and the use of the model for inversion is discussed and compared with other approaches found in the literature. The model parameters are discussed in terms of their relation to wind speed and temperature. Results from the different acquisitions are combined to improve the stem volume estimation. The accuracy in terms of rms error (RMSE) for standwise estimated stem volume approximate to 10 m(3)/ha using ERS-1/2 coherence. Using backscatter and coherence from JERS-1 we obtain an RMSE of approximate to30-35 m(3)/ha. Finally, conditions for accurate retrieval of stem volume using multitemporal InSAR observations are discussed. We conclude that C- and L-band repeat-pass InSAR can provide stem volume estimates in boreal forests with accuracies similar to those of standard in situ measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available